Question
There are many people still living with their parents even when they turn 20s or 30s. Why is this happening? Is it better for young people to live with their parents?
Key Points to Discuss
1. Reasons why people live with parents into their 20s/30s:
- Economic
challenges (e.g., high rent, unemployment).
- Cultural norms
(e.g., collectivist societies valuing family bonds).
- Delayed life
milestones (e.g., marriage, career stability).
-
Emotional/financial support from parents.
2. Is it better for young people?
- Advantages:
Financial savings, emotional security, shared responsibilities.
- Disadvantages:
Reduced independence, slower personal growth, societal stigma.
---
Sample Answer (Band
8+ Structure)
In recent decades, an increasing number of young adults
continue to reside with their parents well into their 20s and 30s. This trend
can be attributed to economic instability and shifting cultural values, and
while it offers certain benefits, it may also hinder personal development.
The primary reason for prolonged cohabitation with parents is financial constraints. Soaring housing prices and precarious job markets make independent living unaffordable for many young people, particularly in urban areas. For instance, in cities like London or Tokyo, most of adults aged 25–34 live with their parents due to exorbitant rent. Additionally, cultural factors play a significant role. In countries like India or Italy, multigenerational households are deeply rooted in tradition, fostering strong familial bonds. Lastly, delayed marriage and career uncertainty encourage young adults to rely on parental support for stability.
While living with parents provides financial relief and emotional comfort, it often comes at the cost of independence. Young adults may struggle to develop life skills such as budgeting or household management, which are crucial for self-reliance. Conversely, those who live independently tend to build resilience and adaptability. However, in cultures where family unity is prioritized, cohabitation can strengthen relationships and reduce stress. Ultimately, the decision depends on individual circumstances: temporary stays for economic reasons may be practical, but prolonged dependence could hinder maturity.
In conclusion, economic hardship and cultural traditions are
key drivers of this trend. Although living with parents offers short-term
advantages, fostering independence is essential for long-term personal growth.
Striking a balance between familial support and self-sufficiency is ideal.
---
Lexical Resources
(Advanced Vocabulary & Phrases)
1. Economic Terms:
- Financial
constraints: Limitations due to money.
- Soaring housing
prices: Rapidly increasing property costs.
- Precarious job
markets: Unstable employment conditions.
2. Cultural Terms:
- Multigenerational
households: Families with multiple generations living together.
- Collectivist
societies: Cultures prioritizing group harmony over individualism.
3. Personal Development:
- Self-reliance:
Ability to depend on oneself.
- Resilience:
Capacity to recover from difficulties.
4. Cohesive Devices:
- Conversely: Used
to show contrast.
- Ultimately:
Indicates a final conclusion.
- Fostering:
Encouraging development.
5. Formal Phrases:
- Exorbitant rent:
Extremely high rental costs.
- Prolonged
dependence: Long-term reliance.
- Striking a
balance: Finding a middle ground.
---
Why This Works
- Task Response: Addresses both parts of the question with
examples.
- Coherence: Uses linking words (e.g., *additionally*,
*conversely*) for logical flow.
- Lexical Resource: Incorporates topic-specific vocabulary
(e.g., *resilience*, *multigenerational*).
No comments:
Post a Comment